A distributed hash table DHT is a decentralized storage system that provides lookup and storage schemes similar to a hash table, storing key-value pairs. Each node in a DHT is responsible for keys along with the mapped values. Any node can efficiently retrieve the value associated with a given key. The nodes in a DHT are connected together through an overlay network in which neighboring nodes are connected.
This network allows the nodes to find any given key in the key-space. View all Courses. All rights reserved. Nodes become bad when they fail to respond to multiple queries in a row. Nodes that we know are good are given priority over nodes with unknown status. The routing table covers the entire node ID space from 0 to 2 The routing table is subdivided into "buckets" that each cover a portion of the space. An empty table has only one bucket so any node must fit within it. Each bucket can only hold K nodes, currently eight, before becoming "full.
In that case, the bucket is replaced by two new buckets each with half the range of the old bucket and the nodes from the old bucket are distributed among the two new ones. For a new table with only one bucket, the full bucket is always split into two new buckets covering the ranges When the bucket is full of good nodes, the new node is simply discarded.
If any nodes in the bucket are known to have become bad, then one is replaced by the new node. If there are any questionable nodes in the bucket have not been seen in the last 15 minutes, the least recently seen node is pinged. If the pinged node responds then the next least recently seen questionable node is pinged until one fails to respond or all of the nodes in the bucket are known to be good.
If a node in the bucket fails to respond to a ping, it is suggested to try once more before discarding the node and replacing it with a new good node. In this way, the table fills with stable long running nodes.
Each bucket should maintain a "last changed" property to indicate how "fresh" the contents are. When a node in a bucket is pinged and it responds, or a node is added to a bucket, or a node in a bucket is replaced with another node, the bucket's last changed property should be updated. Buckets that have not been changed in 15 minutes should be "refreshed.
Nodes that are able to receive queries from other nodes usually do not need to refresh buckets often. Nodes that are not able to receive queries from other nodes usually will need to refresh all buckets periodically to ensure there are good nodes in their table when the DHT is needed. Upon inserting the first node into its routing table and when starting up thereafter, the node should attempt to find the closest nodes in the DHT to itself.
The routing table should be saved between invocations of the client software. The BitTorrent protocol has been extended to exchange node UDP port numbers between peers that are introduced by a tracker. In this way, clients can get their routing tables seeded automatically through the download of regular torrents. Newly installed clients who attempt to download a trackerless torrent on the first try will not have any nodes in their routing table and will need the contacts included in the torrent file.
Peers supporting the DHT set the last bit of the 8-byte reserved flags exchanged in the BitTorrent protocol handshake. Peers that receive this message should attempt to ping the node on the received port and IP address of the remote peer.
If a response to the ping is recieved, the node should attempt to insert the new contact information into their routing table according to the usual rules. A trackerless torrent dictionary does not have an "announce" key.
Christopher Tarquini Christopher Tarquini Add a comment. Active Oldest Votes. Yes, values can be lost due to expiration TTLs or churn as peers come and go, they may take portions of the keyspace with them if there are not enough replicas for those values. So to persist a value for long periods one would need to continually issue PUT requests.
Since in BitTorrent swarms peers are constantly joining and leaving, this is less of a problem, and long-living peers can re-announce themselves to the DHT periodically. Your answer will be better, if you incorporate your comments into it. The original information bootstraps the later use of the DHT.
Sign up or log in Sign up using Google. Sign up using Facebook. Sign up using Email and Password. Post as a guest Name. This will allow us to search the list in time that is logarithmic in the network's size, O log N lookup time. Unlike a skip-list, Kademlia is somewhat unstable since peers can join, leave, and rejoin the network at any time.
To deal with the unstable nature of the system, a Kademlia peer does not just keep links to the peers with distance 1,2,4, Instead, for each multiple of 2 away, it keeps up to K links. For example, instead of a peer keeping a single link away, it would keep 20 links that are between 65 and away. The selection of network-wide parameters like K is not arbitrary. It is determined based on the observed average churn in the network and the frequency with which the network will republish information.
System parameters, like K , are computed to maximize the probability that the network stays connected and that no data is lost while maintaining the desired latency for queries and assuming the average churn observations stay constant. These system and network parameters drive the decisions made in Kademlia's two main components: the routing table, which tracks all those links in the network, and the lookup algorithm, which determines how to traverse those links to store and retrieve data.
A major property of Kademlia is that all peers can be arranged from smallest to largest. This is useful because as peer 0 walks down the line to find peer 55 , it can know it's getting progressively closer. However, this requires that everyone on the line can talk to each other. Otherwise, peer 33 might send peer 0 down a dead-end by telling them the content they want is on a node they can't communicate with.
This can result in a slow and fragmented network, with data being accessible by some peers and not others. While having peers that cannot talk to each other may sound like an oddity, two prevalent causes of unreachability are network address translators NATs and firewalls. Having asymmetrical networks where peers X , Y , and Z can connect to A , but A cannot connect to them is fairly common.
Similarly, it is extremely common that peers A and B , which are both behind NATs, cannot talk to each other. To deal with this, IPFS nodes ignore other nodes assumed to be unreachable by the general public. Nodes also filter themselves out of the network if they suspect they are not reachable. To do this, we use libp2p's AutoNAT opens new window , which acts as a distributed session traversal utility for NAT STUN layer, informing peers of their observed addresses and whether or not they appear to be publicly dialable.
Only when peers detect that they are publicly dialable do they switch from client mode where they can query the DHT but not respond to queries to server mode where they can both query and respond to queries. Similarly, if a server discovers that it is no longer publicly dialable, it will switch back into client mode. These requests are infrequent and do not have a noticeable overhead. However, some nodes operate in segregated networks such as local networks or isolated VPNs. For these users, having a DHT where all non-publicly dialable nodes are clients is very problematic since none of them are publicly dialable.
0コメント